The Ultimate Fail: How Islam’s Denial of the Bible Destroys Its Own Theological Legitimacy

Part 6

Introduction: The Endgame of Islamic Polemics 

Having exposed the internal contradictions, the contradictions between the Qur'an and the Gospel, the inconsistent use of scripture, and the implosion of the corruption doctrine (Tahrif), we now arrive at the inevitable conclusion.

Islam’s theological framework, especially as it pertains to the Bible and the Injil, crumbles under its own contradictions. There is no way out of the logical dead end the Qur'an has created for itself. From the start, the Qur'an’s affirmations of the Injil and the Jewish Torah cannot coexist with the later Islamic claims of corruption, selective use of the Bible, and theological missteps.

---

1. The Qur'an Calls for Christian Guidance, But Offers No Real Answers

We’ve established that the Qur’an acknowledges the Injil as guidance and light (5:46), and commands Christians to judge by it (5:47). But there’s an inherent problem here:

• If the Injil is “light and guidance,” why then does the Qur'an encourage Muslims to challenge the divinity of Jesus?

• If the Injil is truly divinely revealed, why is it rejected in favor of Muhammad's claims?

Contradiction #1: The Qur’an makes a claim about the Injil’s role in guiding Christians, yet Muslims hold contradictory beliefs about it.

---

2. The Bible as a Reliable Source — Until It’s Not

If the Qur’an affirms the authority of the Bible (which it does), then how can it simultaneously claim the Bible was corrupted?

• If the Torah and Injil were altered, how does the Qur’an repeatedly cite them in order to back up its own narrative?

The Qur'an, as a theological framework, can’t stand on its own feet. It appeals to earlier revelations for legitimacy, but those same revelations are rendered useless by the claim of textual corruption. This self-destructive cycle of validation and invalidation exposes the weakness in Islamic claims.

---

3. The Gospels Prove the Qur’an’s Defeat on Jesus' Divinity

There’s no escaping the fact that the New Testament explicitly claims the divinity of Christ, a cornerstone of Christian belief that the Qur’an consistently denies. The Christian texts that the Qur'an recognizes as valid (i.e., the Injil) proclaim Jesus as the Son of God, the Savior of mankind, and the one who died for the sins of the world.

Yet, in a stunning contradiction, the Qur'an claims that Christians are guilty of shirk (polytheism) for worshipping Jesus. In order to maintain this theological hostility, Islam must deny the very scriptures it claims are divine.

---

4. The Denial of the Crucifixion: A Fatal Blow to Islamic Legitimacy

One of the most widely debated issues is the denial of Jesus’ crucifixion. The Qur'an does not clearly state that Jesus was crucified but implies he was not (Surah 4:157). However, the New Testament makes the crucifixion a central tenant of faith.

If Islam acknowledges the Injil as true, it cannot logically deny the crucifixion. Yet it does. By doing so, it invalidates its own attempt to reconcile with the Gospel.

Contradiction #2: The Qur'an cannot deny a core teaching of the Injil while affirming the Injil’s status as valid.

---

5. The Tahrif Doctrine: A Last-Ditch Effort to Save Face

The invention of the Tahrif doctrine (the idea that the Bible has been corrupted) came as an attempt to explain away the glaring contradictions between the Qur'an and the New Testament. But as we’ve demonstrated, this doctrine is nothing more than a theological coping mechanism, invented after the Qur’an’s revelation.

The theory of corruption runs into the same issue: how can you trust a book that affirms something then argues it was distorted?

Contradiction #3: The Tahrif doctrine is a reactionary theological patch, not a divinely revealed truth.

---

Conclusion: Islam’s Self-Destruction

The Qur'an's reliance on the Injil for legitimacy, while simultaneously attacking it, creates a theological black hole. The contradictions between what the Qur'an says about the Bible and what it says about Christ’s divinity, the crucifixion, and salvation lead to a single conclusion: Islam cannot stand.

When a religion’s core texts self-destruct by their own logic, it is the clearest indication that those texts are not divinely inspired. The Qur'an fails at every turn to reconcile the mess it creates with its affirmation of the Injil. The attempted deflection through the Tahrif doctrine only deepens the contradiction.

Islam’s theological foundation is built upon contradictions, which it has no way of resolving. This fatal flaw proves that Islam is nothing more than an imperfect human construct, not the eternal truth it claims to be.

Islam’s claim to truth is dead in the water.