From Revelation to Ruin

How Islam Self-Destructs by Its Own Standards

---

🔥 Introduction: The Final Domino

Every system of belief stands or falls by its own standards.

Islam claims to be:

• The final revelation in a series of divine messages

• The preserver and confirmer of earlier scripture

• The unalterable word of God

• The flawless continuation of divine religion from Adam to Muhammad

But when tested by its own claims, Islam doesn’t just bend — it self-destructs.

This final part pulls the entire case together, showing how Islam collapses under the weight of its own theology.

---

🧱 Islam’s Foundational Assertions

The Qur’an claims:

1. Confirmation of previous scriptures

   "It is He who has sent down the Book to you... confirming what was before it." (3:3)

2. The Torah and Gospel were divine revelation

   "We sent down the Torah... in it was guidance and light." (5:44)
   "We gave him the Gospel... a guidance and light." (5:46)

3. God’s word cannot be changed

   "There is no changing the words of Allah." (6:115, 18:27, 10:64)

4. Muslims must judge by previous books

   "Let the People of the Gospel judge by what Allah has revealed therein." (5:47)

5. Muhammad was foretold in earlier scriptures

   "They find him written with them in the Torah and the Gospel." (7:157)

---

💣 But Then — the Contradictions Begin

The Qur’an also says:

• Jews and Christians corrupted their scriptures (2:75, 2:79, 3:78)

• The Qur’an is needed because earlier texts are no longer reliable (implied)

• The Qur’an replaces previous revelations (e.g., 5:48, 16:101)

This creates an unresolvable paradox:

How can the Qur’an both confirm the Torah and Gospel,
while also declaring them corrupted?

And worse:

How can God’s word be unchangeable if 75% of His previous revelations were allegedly changed?

---

🧠 Syllogism: The Fatal Contradiction

Syllogism 1: Internal Collapse

1. The Qur’an says the Torah and Gospel were from God.

2. The Qur’an says God’s word cannot be changed.

3. Therefore, the Torah and Gospel cannot be corrupted.

4. Islam claims they were corrupted.
   🔚 Conclusion: Islam contradicts itself.

---

Syllogism 2: The Legitimacy Trap

1. The Qur’an derives legitimacy by claiming to confirm earlier books.

2. If earlier books are corrupted, the Qur’an is confirming falsehood.

3. If earlier books are preserved, then the Qur’an’s contradictions with them become fatal.
   🔚 Conclusion: Islam destroys its own credibility — either way.

---

Syllogism 3: Immutable Revelation

1. Islam claims God’s revelations cannot be altered.

2. Islam claims previous revelations were altered.
   🔚 Conclusion: One of these statements must be false.

---

🧩 Real-World Implications

1️⃣ The Gospels contradict the Qur’an

• Jesus died by crucifixion → Qur’an denies it (4:157)

• Jesus is divine Son of God → Qur’an calls it blasphemy (5:72)

• Jesus taught grace and sonship → Qur’an teaches works and servitude

If the Gospel is preserved:

The Qur’an is false.

If the Gospel is corrupted:

The Qur’an is false — because it says the Gospel is God’s word and unchangeable.

Either way → Qur’an invalidates itself.

---

2️⃣ Muhammad’s Prophethood Is Built on This Fragile Bridge

The Qur’an says:

“Those who follow the Messenger... whom they find written in the Torah and Gospel.” (7:157)

But:

• There is no unambiguous prophecy of Muhammad in the Torah or Gospels

• Christians and Jews of Muhammad’s time rejected him — and still do

• The claim depends on the idea that earlier scriptures both contain the prophecy and are corrupted except for this verse

That’s special pleading, not theology.
You can’t call a text corrupt and then mine it for proof.

📉 Therefore: Muhammad’s prophetic claim collapses too.

---

3️⃣ The Quran’s Own Legitimacy Falls

If God’s past words were corrupted:

• What’s to stop the Qur’an from being corrupted too?

Muslims reply:

“God promised to protect it!” (15:9)

But:

• He also revealed the Torah and Gospel

• And they were supposedly corrupted — despite being God’s word

So the protection claim is already in doubt — based on Islam’s own history.

---

🔥 Recap: The Chain Reaction Collapse

1. Hadith collapses → No Sunnah, no law, no rituals

2. Muhammad becomes unknowable → No example, no prophet, no authority

3. The Qur’an becomes unintelligible → No context, no coherence

4. Doctrine contradicts itself → No continuity, no legitimacy

5. The core claims about revelation, preservation, and confirmation implode

Islam doesn't fall to external critique.
It falls to its own claims, tested logically and historically.

---

🧱 Final Conclusion: Revelation Becomes Ruin

Islam is like a three-legged stool:

1. The Book (Qur’an)

2. The Man (Muhammad)

3. The Legacy (Hadith/Sunnah)

We’ve now shown:

• The Book contradicts itself

• The Man is unknowable and morally incoherent

• The Legacy is fabricated and unverifiable

Kick out one leg — the stool wobbles.

Kick out all three — it collapses.

And now, it has.

---

📘 This Concludes the Series:

🧨 The Islamic Collapse Series: A Forensic Deconstruction

Full Index:

1. Dead on Arrival: Why Muhammad’s Islam Doesn’t Exist Anymore

2. The Death of Sunnah: What Happens When Hadith Die

3. The Muhammad You Cannot Know

4. The Lawless Revelation: Why the Qur’an Can’t Sustain Sharia

5. The Qur’an’s Internal Collapse

6. The Myth of Continuity

7. Faith in Fabrication: The Hadith Forgery Crisis

8. The Model Man Problem

9. From Revelation to Ruin: Islam Self-Destructs by Its Own Standards