Adapted by Allah?
How Borrowed Myths in the Qur’an Shatter the Illusion of Divine Authorship
One of the boldest claims Islam makes is that the Qur’an is the literal, unaltered, perfect speech of Allah—a book that descended from the heavens, untouched by human hands, and unmatched by any creation.
But here’s the uncomfortable reality:
The Qur’an doesn’t read like divine revelation.
It reads like a patchwork of myths, oral tales, heretical theology, and apocryphal leftovers, rebranded as holy scripture.
And even worse—some of those stories can be traced directly to known human sources. Slightly adapted? Sometimes. Word-for-word? In parts.
But always with the same fatal flaw: they predate Islam, and they’re demonstrably human.
Let’s tear off the divine mask and take a hard look at what this means.
🔥 The Core Problem: You Can’t Borrow If You’re Divine
The Qur’an claims it came directly from Allah, with no human influence. It doubles down:
“It is not the word of a poet... nor the word of a soothsayer... it is a revelation from the Lord of the Worlds.”
— Qur’an 69:41–43
“We have not omitted anything from the Book.”
— Qur’an 6:38
“Do they not reflect upon the Qur’an? Had it been from other than Allah, they would have found much contradiction in it.”
— Qur’an 4:82
And yet… we do find contradictions.
We find borrowed legends.
We find rewritten myths.
We find adapted religious heresies passed off as original revelation.
🧠 Adaptation = Human Authorship
Let’s be clear: adaptation is not a divine act—it’s a human one.
Modifying stories, retelling them, changing details to fit a new message—this is exactly what storytellers and religious cults have done for millennia.
If Allah is all-knowing and eternal, why is he repackaging ancient Gnostic theology, Jewish folklore, and Christian apocrypha instead of delivering entirely new truth?
You can’t claim divine originality while borrowing from known, traceable, man-made traditions.
🧾 The Crucifixion Denial in Qur’an 4:157: A Heresy Recycled
“They did not kill him, nor crucify him, but it was made to appear so to them...”
— Qur’an 4:157
Muslims point to this as a bold divine correction of Christian error. But the idea that Jesus was not crucified, and that someone else was made to look like him?
That didn’t originate with Muhammad. It came centuries earlier from Gnostic heresies like those of Basilides, who taught:
Jesus was pure spirit and didn’t die,
Simon of Cyrene was crucified instead,
Jesus stood by, unseen, laughing at their ignorance.
This wasn’t divine revelation. It was religious science fiction.
And the Qur’an parrots it almost verbatim.
📚 Other Borrowed Stories in the Qur’an
This isn’t an isolated case. The Qur’an is loaded with repackaged tales:
The Seven Sleepers of Ephesus – Found in Greek and Syriac sources before Islam.
Infant Jesus speaking – Pulled from the Arabic Infancy Gospel, an apocryphal Christian story.
Abraham smashing idols – Lifted from Jewish Midrash, not the Torah.
Solomon talking to animals – Already found in Talmudic and folklore traditions.
Alexander the Great as “Dhul-Qarnayn” – A garbled retelling of the Romance of Alexander literature.
All of this material existed before the Qur’an. And it’s not “divinely similar”—it’s historically traceable.
💥 The Fatal Blow: If the Stories Came First, the Qur’an Can’t Be Divine
Here’s the knockout punch:
If those stories didn’t exist before the Qur’an, you might have a case.
If these narratives first appeared in the Qur’an, that might suggest divine origin or miraculous insight.
But we have the evidence. We have the manuscripts.
We have the heresies, the legends, the folklore, the apocrypha—all pre-dating Islam.
So when the Qur’an recycles these stories, slightly altered or not, it’s doing exactly what a 7th-century religious leader with access to oral traditions would do.
It doesn’t look like revelation.
It looks like repurposing.
And Allah doesn’t “repurpose.”
Humans do.
🤖 Divine Revelation Doesn’t Adapt – It Creates
A truly divine message would:
Correct falsehoods,
Transcend mythologies,
And introduce something new and indisputably true.
But instead, we get a Qur’an that:
Copies Gnostic myths,
Adopts folkloric Jewish legends,
Echoes Christian apocrypha,
And presents it as if it were fresh revelation.
The truth?
It’s secondhand theology with a new stamp.
🧨 Final Mic Drop
The Qur’an didn’t descend from heaven. It rose from the ash heap of old myths and heresies.
And when your “revelation” is full of borrowed material, don’t call it divine.
Call it what it is: religious plagiarism.
No comments:
Post a Comment